Comparison · vs Vimeo review
Vimeo review vs chimping.io: publishing work or moving it
Vimeo added review and collaboration to its plans, which puts it in the same conversation as the review tools. But Vimeo is still fundamentally a hosting platform, and that is not a criticism, it is the reason to choose it.
The short answer
Vimeo does one thing I cannot do at all: it gives you a public home for finished work, a good player, and a portfolio clients can browse. If you need somewhere to publish, Vimeo earns its place on your card and this comparison should not talk you out of it. What it does not do is the middle of the job. Review on Vimeo is review on a hosting platform, so camera-card transfers, handing a cut to a colorist, getting graded files back with folder structure, and delivering a master that is not also a public-ish page all still need somewhere else to live.
Side by side
Vimeo vs chimping.io
| Vimeo | chimping.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $12/mo billed annually, $20 monthly (Starter) | $9/mo (Solo), no annual lock-in |
| Seats at entry | 1 user | Unlimited collaborators, flat price |
| Storage at entry | 2 TB | 500 GB |
| Public hosting | Yes, that is the product | No |
| Portfolio and player | Customisable player, galleries, branding | Not a feature |
| Client review | Review and collaboration tools on paid plans | Timecoded comments, per-asset approval |
| Reviewer accounts | Not required | Not required |
| Master delivery | Hosting and download permissions | Password-protected link, no expiry, folder structure kept |
| Camera-card transfers | Not the product | Flat-rate transfer links, structure preserved |
| Receiving work back | Not the product | Receive links, hierarchy intact, no account |
| Project folder sync | No | Project Sync across every machine |
| DaVinci Resolve | No native integration | Notes import as timeline markers |
| Next tier | Standard $25/mo annual, 5 users, 4 TB | Studio $19/mo flat, Pro $35 |
Vimeo figures from vimeo.com/upgrade, checked 25 October 2026. Annual prices shown; monthly is $20, $41 and $125 on Starter, Standard and Advanced. If this has moved, tell me and I will update it.
Which one you want
Pick Vimeo if
- You need somewhere to publish finished work. A reel, a portfolio, films clients and commissioners can watch.
- The player matters: branding, custom watermark, no ads, galleries.
- You want hosting and review on one bill and can handle delivery separately.
- 2 TB of storage at $12 is the shape of what you need.
Pick chimping.io if
- The work between the shoot and the finished file is what hurts: offloads, handoffs, revisions, delivery.
- You send footage to a colorist or mixer and need it back organised rather than flattened.
- You want more than one person on the job without buying seats.
- You cut in Resolve and want client notes on the timeline.
- A master delivery should be a private link with a password, not a hosted page.
What it actually costs
They are not really substitutes
Most people who ask about this end up needing both, so the useful question is what each one is actually replacing.
You need a public reel and occasional client review
Vimeo: $12/mo on Starter covers both. This is a real answer and the cheapest one.
chimping.io: $9/mo and you still have nowhere to publish. Vimeo is the better single purchase here.
A working post pipeline, with a portfolio you already have elsewhere
Vimeo: $12/mo for review, plus something for transfers and something for delivery.
chimping.io: $9/mo covering review, transfers, receive links and delivery on one subscription.
Three people on a job, plus a client handoff
Vimeo: Standard at $25/mo annual for 5 seats, with the file movement still unsolved.
chimping.io: $19/mo on Studio, flat, with Project Sync keeping the folder current across all three machines.
If you buy both, that is not a failure of either one. Vimeo publishes, this moves the work. The overlap is only the comment box.
Questions people ask
Frequently asked
Can chimping.io host my reel?
No. There is no public hosting, no portfolio, no embeddable player and no plan to build one. Review links and delivery links are private and meant for people you send them to. If you need a public home for finished work, you need Vimeo or something like it.
Is Vimeo's review good enough to replace a dedicated tool?
For straightforward rounds of notes on a cut, often yes. Where it shows its origins is around the edges: it is built for a finished video on a page, so versioning, handoffs and getting raw material back from a vendor are not what it is shaped for.
Vimeo gives me 2 TB for $12 and you give me 500 GB for $9. Why?
Vimeo is storing finished, compressed videos for playback. We are storing masters, plus moving large originals around, which is a more expensive thing to run. Review encoding here has its own meter and expires on its own, so the 500 GB stays available for finished files rather than proxies.
Do my clients need a Vimeo account to comment?
No, same as here. Neither of us should claim that as a differentiator any more.
Can I use both?
That is the common setup and the one I would suggest. Work moves through here, finished pieces go up on Vimeo. The only duplication is review, and you will naturally end up using whichever is closer to where the work currently sits.
Compare with another tool
More head-to-heads
vs Frame.io
Per-seat enterprise review tool.
Read →
vs MASV
Pay-per-GB transfer service.
Read →
vs WeTransfer
Consumer-grade file send.
Read →
vs Dropbox
General-purpose cloud storage.
Read →
vs Wipster
Focused review tool, same price.
Read →
vs Filestage
Agency proofing and approvals.
Read →
vs Dropbox Replay
Review bundled into Dropbox.
Read →
Or see the full comparison hub.
3-day trial
If you need to publish, buy Vimeo. If you need to deliver, try this.
Three days against a real job is enough to tell which half of the problem you actually have.